18 January 2009

Exchange Ideas

The biggest problem facing horse racing growth today is the fact that they fail to compete to gain new customers while also failing to compete to keep old customers.
The racetrack isn't the place to be anymore for the gambler and internet has made the world a lot smaller.

Gambling is growing worldwide, but gambling on horse racing has been on the decline, not just due to the global recession, but prior to that, betting on horse racing has dropped in real dollars, despite the fact that one can gamble from anywhere anytime today.

I expect 2009 to be way worse than 2008 when it comes to parimutuel horse racing. The economy is in the pits, more and more players are being turned off horse racing as it is perceived as strictly a losing proposition by the masses (at least those who don't bet at rebate shops), and credit card deposits are going to become scrutinized by card companies, while more and more addicted gamblers have no more room to deposit to an ADW. The other factor is that horsemen groups are demanding more of a cut, reducing the amount players receive from rebaters. More price sensitive players, who account for a large percentage of the handle, may just either cut back or continue to leave.

Horse racing is in dire need of a major pricing change. It needs to show the masses that the game is beatable in order to attract new young blood to play.

I've often said that horse racing needs a poster boy in North America, a big winner who bets horses and consistently wins.

Poker has quite a few, and new heroes are made every now and then as well. Like Poorya Nazari, a Canadian who recently won $3 million by becoming the PokerStars Caribbean Adventure Champion. How many gamblers reading this right now can't help but think "this could be me?" Anyone thinking of gambling will be attracted to poker and not give horse racing an afterthought.
And poker is easy on newbies as well, because the game has a relatively low rake (or takeout). The cost to become a poker addict isn't all that great. And the low rake gives the player much more time for the bankroll to last, than does horse racing.

Poker is a lot easier to grasp as well. Not nearly the high amount of nuances are needed to become good at poker. Horse racing takes a lot of work in order to become good at it. And even if you are good at, it is highly unlikely you will win. You'll might only lose 5-10 cents on every dollar bet, instead of the average 20 cents. Why would anyone new be attracted to bet horses under current conditions?


Horse racing does have poster boys though...say what?
Thanks to Pull The Pocket for discovering the fact that there are at least a couple of players doing more for horse racing than every marketing department in North America put together can. The problem for North American horse racing is that these players are exchange bettors.

First Poster Boy: Adam Heathcote. A 23 year old from across the pond in London, England. He has a goal to make 150,000 pounds (around $300,000 Canadian) in 2009 betting through Betfair. He has only been playing for around a year and a half. He has a blog (Horse Racing Trader) that he updates regularly regarding his quest. As of January 14th, he was up over 8,000 pounds on the year, which is slightly higher than needed to achieve his goal.

Then there is Betdaq and Betfair Racing Trader This anonymous player had a goal to make 100,000 pounds, while starting with 1,000 pounds in 2008. By mid December, the gambler went over the revised goal of 120,000 pounds.

Sure, we have the odd blog touts in North America, who give out their selections and bets almost daily, but what is sorely missing are anything that resembles goals with actual dollar amounts. Why? Because nobody wants to make a complete fool out of himself or herself. Every bettor knows that thanks to 20%+ takeouts, a goal of breaking even would be a difficult enough feat.

I just wonder how many new players have been inspired by the two exchange bloggers cited above. I'd say many.

Exchange betting doesn't mean people will win, even if they become good, but the possibility is really there, and that is what is important. Lets face it, most exchange bettors will lose. Betfair keeps around 3.5% of what is bet on average, and Betfair cannot lose, much like a track cannot lose taking a bet (except for the odd minus pool which I don't think happens at Betfair). Still, because of low commission and churn, players get a huge bang for their buck and are highly likely to continue to play, and tell others about it.

North America needs to do two things. Reduce the takeout to 10-12% everywhere. And secondly, it needs to set up their own exchange, where the tracks that get action get the bulk of the 3.5-5% commission lost by players.

See also, Interesting Winning Bettors-At Racing!



The North American Horse Racing Industry Can Blame Itself for It's Demise...
Good article, read it. Especially something us Toronto born horseplayers can really relate to.
Horse racing is a gambling product not an entertainment one. Racing execs either want to pretend this isn't the case or still "think" they can dupe the public into believing it isn't the case.

Here is an excerpt that is further proof that Woodbine Entertainment could do itself a favour by cleaning house:

In 1996 when Woodbine was to host the Breeder's Cup, the union that represented the ticket takers went on strike. David Willmot, the President of Woodbine Entertainment, considered withdrawing his bid to host the Cup. Upon hearing this I contacted Mr. Willmot and told him that if he did so he would pass up a golden opportunity to win a new generation of fans, and once again reclaim the families that would witness the great racing of the championship day. He in turn invited me to the offices at Woodbine to discuss the issue, telling me that he is indeed interested in the fans that became disenfranchised and that my demographic was exactly what they were trying to win over (20-30 something families with young children). We discussed numerous concerns, from lack of things for families to do, small field sizes, high takeouts, disassociation of the horsemen from the fans, lack of perks for larger horse bettors and many other issues. I mentioned about 20 issues, and he agreed with every single comment I made. In fact he told me of his grand plan to make Woodbine into the ultimate Entertainment complex. He envisioned family areas, slots for the single women who didn't want to attend the races, new betting options, perks for the regular attendees, lower takeouts for those who bet more and a better form of entertainment for all who come to the track. While off-track betting and racing on TV were starting to grow, Willmot agreed that the only way to get the next generation and those afterwards interested in horse racing again was to woo them back to the track. Only seeing the product live would win over those who aren't familiar with it. He listened to my arguments and comments, agreed with all of them, and implemented none. Yes, slots were added to the track, but those were already in the works prior to the meeting. Parking and admission prices, were dropped, but that was only because they couldn't charge people to play the slots. New betting options were added, but only ones that weren't winnable. I was talking about ideas such as horse matchups, and Woodbine instead opted for pick 7s and superfectas. As far as a place for women and children to enjoy themselves, Woodbine offers little; and on my travels to other tracks throughout the U.S., I noticed there was nothing for families there either. Plus, for the loyal race goer there are still no perks for them. In fact the only perks offered are for those who bet at teletheaters or by phone. Betting at the track gains the bettor nothing.

**********************************
Things have changed further since 1996, making the idea of attracting newbies by getting them to the track even more difficult. It is so easy to gamble on more competitive forms of gambling from home, lotteries have been growing in popularity, and slots has made the idea of family outings a near impossibility, as one of the parents is likely to be attracted to the slots, thus breaking up the family experience that was once found in the 60's and 70's.


New Horse Racing Time Waster from Addicting Games
A new easy to play horse racing game has appeared at addictinggames.com; Racehorse Tycoon. I like the part where you get to choose the horse's diet. Your choices include beers, cakes, burgers, or cheese:) I usually choose beer since vodka injections aren't on the list.
And the best part of the game is that you can play and after an hour or two, you haven't lost a dime.

4 comments:

bullring said...

I have no idea why HPI TV refuses to show Oaklawn Park. It is pretty much THE premier winter track these days. They were showing Fraser Downs IN THE FOG over Oaklawn Park the other day. Unreal.

Cangamble said...

It might be a Canadian content situation or a deal with Great Canadian Gaming. Or it could be due to the fact that Oaklawn has lower takeouts.
Takeout Information For Oaklawn Park

Win, place, and show: 17%
All exotic wagering: 21%
In other words, they make less when their customers play Oaklawn. However, I think it is probably one of the first two reasons.

They probably show an Oaklawn live feed on their web site.

Anonymous said...

This was sent to hbpa members on January 19th.
To All Members,



Please be advised a press conference will be held 9:00am Tuesday January 20th, 2009 to discuss and provide information regarding an offer to purchase Fort Erie Racetrack from Nordic Gaming.



Further information will be forth coming.



Regards,





Sue Leslie

The Editor said...

Jim Thibert wants to buy the track for $35 million. Be afraid, be very afraid.