Showing posts with label Ajax Downs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ajax Downs. Show all posts

25 April 2010

Handle Talk; Poker Rooms At Racetracks

HANDLE NEWS

Sunland Park bucks the trend. Their handle went up 5% over last year. With the industry down around 10% compared to last year, that is quite an improvement.

Hawthorne's daily handle was up 4% in March compared to March last year. They canned running on Thursdays and Sundays, and ran Tuesdays and Wednesdays instead (days when competition is lighter). Woodbine should consider Mondays and Tuesdays (though Fort Erie wouldn't like it), as they need to race when competition isn't around.

Hawthorne does pretty well, considering they are ranked around 35th in total purse distributions per day, they rank 18th in total handle per race. Woodbine ranks 5th in purse distribution per day, but ranks below Hawthorne (19th) in total handle per race.

Keeneland handle dipped 7%. They did outperform the industry, but field size plagued them this year, as the dropped from over 9 horses a race to under 8.

I don't have data on Gulfstream Park field size, but they bucked the trend as well, as out of state handle rose 5%, giving them a 4% increase over last year. Gulfstream Park has relatively low takeouts and higher than average field size (according to last year's stats). They also made a good move in changing the date of the Florida Derby and got lucky with some weekend cancellations of California tracks.

With Keeneland done for the spring, Woodbine had very good handle day (for Woodbine) yesterday, as over $2.8 million was bet.  Big fields dominated the card.

Thanks to yesterday, their last five racing days have shown an increase of .5% over last year, which means their handle woes have been cut in half, from being down 20%, to being down only 10% from last year at this time.  Still a cause for concern, as they didn't have the deal with TVG in place until the summer, and that helped them out last year immensely.


There seems to be some sort of trend being established. Tracks that are available at all ADWs in the US are doing well, as long as they don't overcharge for their distribution.

Keeneland charges higher than average fees for their signal, the same with the California tracks, and of course the Tracknet tracks (which also restrict rebates even more), and throw in Woodbine too. And when it comes to availability, none are available everywhere, and what I mean by everywhere, are the ADWs that offer rebates to horseplayers.

They are shooting themselves in the foot that way, but also by charging larger fees, they restrict what can be offered to the horseplayer. Track takeout isn't as consequential to rebate players as the fees a track charges for the signal. And what is happening now, is there is a shift going on, as price conscious players are now betting more on tracks that allow for a lower net takeout (track takeout minus rebate) than these A tracks that have a higher net takeout. Field size still will attract the price conscious players in many cases though, so there are exceptions.

The only growing part of the industry right now, is the ADW sector, and to be more specific, the ADW market that gives out rebates. Rebates are not a bad thing. They keep the horseplayer in the game longer, and this helps maintain and most probably grow the game, as many of these players believe they can beat the game because some actually do. The problem is that the industry doesn't want to publicize this because it is an admission that takeout is way too high.

So tracks like Sunland and Hawthorne are seeing handle rise while most high signal tracks are seeing handles continuing to drop.

Takeout still matters a lot. Players need to stay in the game as long as possible in order to grow the game. Horseplayers who go to the track and bet live races are the best asset for growth horse racing has, but they are the ones who pay on average the highest net takeout (aside from the yo yo's who bet at NY OTB's and mindlessly pay the surcharge).

Fort Erie takes 26.2% on exactors and doubles from their live players and then they wonder where the players went. That is like McDonald's charging $8 for Big Macs and wondering where the customers are. The more a horseplayer wins, the more they bet back. The longer the player lasts, more likely the player is getting hooked. The more a horseplayer leaves the track with, the more likely the horseplayer will return ASAP.


Ajax Downs' Nick Coukos Tries To Make A Case About Turning Poker Players Into Horseplayers

Coukos believes that by allowing poker rooms at the track, that there is a shot that some players will crossover.

They have poker rooms at some tracks in the US, and handle is down down down. There is no evidence to show this will remotely work.

Boils down to takeout. House take in poker is much lower than takeout at the ponies. There are visible winners at poker too. Long term winners. Winners who made enough money to move from their parent's basement to a mansion. Not so when it comes to horse racing.

Poker player's bankrolls last much longer than pony players too. Even if you get a poker player to cross over, it won't last most of the time.

Nick Coukos is not a bad handicapper, but he admits that he went from being a poker player to a horse player and back to being a poker player now. Players go where they have the biggest bang for their buck, and it seems Coukos is doing pretty well at poker. He just won a tournament at Caesars in Vegas, beating out 194 opponents and going home with prize money worth 15 Grand.

Almost makes me want to throw away the racing form and take up poker. Note: I used to play hold em in my early 20's a few nights a week for a good spell. It was very enjoyable, but not as stimulating for me as horse racing is....but way less expensive (potentially).

Click here for some comments from Pace Advantage on the idea of poker rooms at tracks.

There is probably more of a danger that horseplayers will crossover and become poker players. And the tracks can't afford to lose more horseplayers.


Jim Day: From Boom To Bust
Sad thing is with the Ontario Sired Program, this kind of thing shouldn't happen. But there is no out for Ontario sired horses. Either they win allowance races or they become worthless. State bred claiming races are desperately needed to help the breeders, owners, and trainers of Ontario bred horses.


This video put a smile on my face especially the part with the giant ball. I like the music too(HT Joanie D at Pace Advantage):


Advertisement

INTRODUCTORY OFFER FROM HORSEPLAYERSBET.COM

BET $100 GET $50 DEPOSITED INTO YOUR ACCOUNT*

*Open up an account and deposit at least $100 in total. Once you wager $100, you will get $50 deposited into your account the very next day. You will also start receiving the regular Excellent Player Reward Bonuses on anything you bet in excess of the initial $100 going forward. Note: To earn the $50 Bonus you must wager at least $100 in total within 7 days of making your initial deposit.

CLICK LOGO TO OPEN A FREE ACCOUNT



Why Horseplayersbet.com:

* EXCELLENT PLAYER REWARDS added to your account weekly.
* User friendly betting interface making wagering easy.
* FREE LIVE VIDEOS.
* FREE RACE REPLAYS.
* Wagering Online & by Phone.
* Great customer service.
* 100% Parimutuel.
* No membership or wagering fees.
* No fees on debit or credit card deposits of $100 or more.


Horseplayersbet.com, WHERE HORSEPLAYERS COME FIRST. SIGN UP TODAY

Player Reward Bonuses could be the difference to you as to whether you win in the long run playing horses or lose. The better the rewards, the more of a chance you have to beat the game. Sure, you still need skill and luck as well to succeed, but at HORSEPLAYERSBET.COM at least you have a fighting chance. And one thing is for sure, your money will last longer because of the PLAYER REWARD BONUSES you receive.

16 July 2009

Ajax Downs Leaves Door Open For Thoroughbred Racing

Ajax Downs VP of Corporate Affairs Nick Coukos was recently interviewed on Trot Radio. He was asked a variety of questions including many to do with the future of the track.

He stated that the reason they are in the midst of making it a 5 furlong track is because they want to be ready in case they get the opportunity to race standardbreds or thoroughbreds.

Standardbreds? Plenty of standardbred tracks in Ontario. But thoroughbred? Is Ajax Downs getting ready to fill the niche that Ontario horsemen will need if Fort Erie decides to close their doors? That is a strong possibility. Very strong.

With Stronach tracks being auctioned off shortly, the few groups or people interested in owning a track will be able to get in and most likely be able to get a nice discount. This coupled with the fact that Nordic has always over priced Fort Erie, I just don't see anyone willing to pay Nordic's price.

When Stronach tracks do sell, the prices they go for might thrust the price Nordic wants into reality. I said might.

One thing is for sure, I don't see there being any money left for Nordic to get handed to them after this year. And I doubt they will operate if they are indeed losing money. The only way I see Nordic operating Fort Erie next year is if the OLG gives them a better cut on slot revenues, and if that could happen, it most likely would have happened earlier this year.

Back to Ajax. They only do around $15,000 in handle a day, but they aren't exporting their signal yet. Coukos said he expects to do that by the end of this year (which probably means the beginning of next year). He says he feels there is only one chance when it comes to marketing his product outside of live racing, and he wants to make sure he does it when the time is right.

Coukos brags that Ajax is giving away in purses more than what Fort Erie is giving a way in purses each racing day. What I found most interesting is that he said that it only costs around half to train a quarter horse as it does a thoroughbred. Does he mean a thoroughbred at Woodbine where the rates are around $80 a day on average, or half of what the rates are at Fort Erie, which averages around $50 a day.

There is an unconfirmed rumour regarding the additional 500 plus slots that Ajax just received: The horsemen will get zilch from those machines.


The OLG Responds To $3.5 Billion Lawsuit Against Them
'Gambling addicts who keep coming back to casinos and racetracks despite joining a voluntary list of problem gamblers aren't the responsibility of provincial authorities, the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. says.'


Again, I just don't see why they offered up the voluntary program then. Didn't they assume responsibility by just having the exclusion program in the first place?

It all depends on how the program form was worded when they first implemented it. I'm sure the OLG changed the wording since the beginning.

And if they aren't responsible, why are they testing out facial recognition technology soon?


Three Strike Program In Australia
A trainer gets a 5 YEAR BAN for milk shaking a horse that wound up finishing fifth. It was his third offense.
Too bad they aren't so tough on cheating trainers in North America.



Harnessdriver.com Chat Board Member Putting A Little Needed Heat On The ORC

"Timebomb" a Windsor Ontario racefan has been on a crusade to get the judges of harness racing in the province to call infractions based on the rulebook. If it is in the rulebook and it is not called (the fines and suspensions are published via the web at Standardbred Canada) he is making sure people know about it.


Link for Harnessdriver.com


ORC Rules That Claims Can Be Ruled Invalid If Positive Results Are Found In A Drug Test
I think that all claimed horses should be tested, and the industry, not the new claiming outfit, should pay for the tests.
Most claimed horses are top performers. They are most likely to be benefiting from performance enhancing drugs.
Why have an added expense tacked on to someone who is willing to take a chance claiming a horse? Integrity should override everything, and these tests should be mandatory, and it is unfair to burden the new owner with this expense.

Not to mention this comment which may hold some truth in light of the fact that there seems to still be "super trainers" who run horses in Ontario:

Greg Parke SAID...

"Mr. Swinhoe (another commenter) don't waste your money. The sport has really cleaned up it's act or the testing is inadequate to find these types of drugs. Same old story, let the buyer beware, you have a 99-1 shot to finding drugs in a horses system with the testing the way it is."


Great Article: Lasix May Help Some Horses, But Is It Worth It?
Bill Finley may doubt if Lasix works at all. A recent study may have put his doubts to bed, as it did show that Lasix does what it is supposed to do: reduces exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage (EIPH) in racehorses.

But what else does Lasix do?

Oh come over 95% of horses that run in Canada and the US are on it and in every other jurisdiction in the world, it is not needed?

Is it worth the fact that it masks other drugs, and enhances performance, and makes it so that horses who end up using Lasix to run fast (either through anti-bleeding or drug masking) become possible stud and broodmare prospects, who most probably weaken the breed by passing on inheritable flaws to the next generation of horses?



It Feels Good To Be Quoted In A John Pricci Column
Good follow up article regarding past posting. Pricci notes:

"One interesting aside was that respondents appeared troubled by the “perception” that late-odds drops were the result of past-posting. Sadly, the only inference that can be drawn from that is that horseplayers seem to care more about how false perceptions hurt racing than regulators do."


Another interesting aside is the fact that there are still a handful of tracks that allow cancel delays (which allows tellers to cancel bets after the race has begun):
Turf Paradise, 8 seconds
Les Bois Park, 5
Bay Meadows, 4
Del Mar, 4
Fairplex Park, 4
Golden Gate, 4
Hollywood Park, 4
North California Fairs, 4
Oak Tree, 4
Portland Meadows, 4
Santa Anita, 4
Yavapai Downs, 4
Gulfstream Park, 3

Many scams have come and gone where astute gamblers, in league with a teller or two, could make bets on contenders, and if the horse doesn't get out of the gate in a good manner, or even jump to the lead out of the gate, the teller simply cancels the ticket.

The fact that this could still happen, is enough reason to close betting at zero minutes to post (the second the 1 MTP disappears).


HANA RACE OF THE WEEK: MOUNTAINEER RACE 2 FRIDAY
We've been picking pools that have been difficult to gauge of late, as to how much power this Pool Party idea has. This week we are going for broke.
We really need support on this one. Early in our campaign we did a race from The Mountain, and according to our calculations we estimate we attracted $15,000 in new money. Please bet this race, because we want to blow that number away.

Mountaineer Race 2 Handicapping Info including Past Performances, Thoro-Graph data here.


Introducing the FREE TrackMaster Players Club
* Track Bias Reports for almost every Thoroughbred race track
* Thoroughbred/Quarter Horse Selections for a handful of races everyday
* Thoroughbred Best Bets reports on selected days
* Audio Selections for New York and California tracks
* Exclusive articles by Steve Davidowitz
* Harness Selections for a handful of races everyday
* StatsMaster, a tool to gather detailed statistics for drivers, trainers and horses from Harness tracks across the country


Chad Beckon Update
Cory Clark on Facebook happily reports that her husband, jockey Chad Beckon, is heading to Toronto today to start rehab.
Beckon was involved in a horrific accident a month ago in a horse race at Woodbine.


Fun Thread On Pace Advantage: Who Is Your Favorite Female Reporter/Analyst In Racing?