20 June 2010

The Trainer Must Have Something

The phrase "the trainer must have something" has been around for quite some time. It doesn't mean that there is no significance to it. Apologists and those who benefit from the use of undetectable drugs like to call it sour grapes, and in some cases that may be true, but overall, if it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck, it is a cheating trainer.

Even tracks like Woodbine admit there are undetectable drugs being used. Maybe not in words, but that is what the detention barn is all about.

The reality is that it is expensive to test for everything, and it is difficult to test for something that is successfully masked, or even worse, an unknown substance.

Rats aren't popular, and it is almost impossible to find one amongst the backstretch community. Shane Sellers admitted he used a buzzer, and he was ripped by many as being a possible liar, or just a despicable person for putting it out there. Personally, I'd love to see a former "super trainer" come out one day and expose himself. Might make for a best seller, assuming there are enough horse racing fans left to buy it, when the book finally comes out.


There are only so many ways to legally train a horse, and most trainers know the angles. That is why when you see a 25% plus trainer over a long stretch, it is an insult to one's intelligence to buy into the excuse that it is the trainer's methods that are behind the win rate.

Sure, there are ways for trainers to increase their win percentage without doing anything underhanded, like spotting horses in small fields (like they do in California), or dropping significantly enough, however, with each win comes one less condition, and therefore tougher competition, so the longer a horse runs under a high percentage trainer, the less likely their win rate will remain as high, in a drug free world that is.

Lots has been written about Super Trainer Lou Pena (harness trainer). Andrew Cohen wrote a series of articles questioning Pena's prowess. The most significant is this one which includes many facts:

"Moreover, the average horse improved over five lengths in those starts. And many of these former trainers are well known and respected horsemen."

In another article, Bob Pandolfo left a comment:

"When you run Trackmaster's Statmaster for Cal Expo (it only goes back to 2005), from 2005 through June 17, 2010, Lou Pena sent out over 3438 horses and had a 14% win percentage and he won 10% first off the claim. Again, according to Statmaster, at Harrahs Chester, his win percentage over the past year and a half is 47% and he has won 75% (12 for 16) first off the claim. At the Meadowlands he won 26% and was 33% first off the claim. At Yonkers he has a 32% win percentage, and is 67% first off the claim. At Pocono he has a 40% win, and 62% first off the claim. At Freehold he is at 27%, and 100% (2 for 2) wins first off the claim. So those who reported how great he did at Cal Expo seemed to have exaggerated. There is no doubt that his overall win% and win% first off the claim have skyrocketed since he moved east."

What I find most disturbing are the Pena supporters. Harness racing is dying faster than thoroughbred racing, yet, what I suspect is coming from a certain clique of trainers and owners, there are people going after Cohen and calling Pena criticizers witch hunters.

Between absurdly high track takeouts and insider drug info, how much chance does Joe Bettor have anymore? And with Super Trainers stealing purse monies, lots of incentives to new owners to try to make a buck in the game, is much depleted.

Sure, Pena might just be a great trainer who is getting extra lucky, but I like my chances of winning the Lotto Max jackpot next Friday more.


So what might Super Trainers be using these days?

One commenter, Joe, wrote this:

"The odds are 1 to 9 that the drug Pena is using to dope his horses with is Micera. It is a third-generation drug called CERA (continuous erythropoiesis receptor activator). It that lasts 6 times longer than DPO and 20 times longer than EPO. It requires only a simple ONCE-PER-MONTH subcutaneous injection. It is undetectable by urine-based doping controls. Micera is widely available in Europe, and has been approved in the USA. However, it is not yet commercially available in the USA due to a legal battle between Roche and Amgen. Certainly not a big problem to overcome."

There is a test for CERA, but I'm unaware if it has been implement at any North American tracks yet.

Of course, when it comes to undetectable drugs and blocks, synthetic cobra venom and snail venom always come up. There is a test for cobra venom, but it still hasn't made it to the North American labs. Here is an interesting video on the problem and the new test:



Venom blocks injuries which allows a horse to run through its soreness. This increases the likelihood of serious breakdowns during the race.

EPO/DPO/Micera are blood boosters. The use of these drugs have been known to have adverse long term effects on horses. Probably one of the reasons that if you pick up a Daily Racing Form from 2 years ago, many times, most of the horses entered aren't around today.

Super Trainers are one step ahead of the testing barn, and from recent conversations, I am starting to think that the real good stuff is most likely a narcotic, one that gets horses wound up like a crack addict trying to score more crack. Something that gets the horse so buzzed that they would run through a wall.

And who knows, more than one undetectable drug can be used at once, if undetectable, the more the merrier to the cheater. Bill Finley has been writing about banning Lasix for years, because according to research, Lasix is a very good mask of other drugs.

The other reason that Super Trainers are probably not using something known is the fact that there are many trainers who experiment all the time with concoctions that they hope won't test because of masking, in order to get an edge. Many do get caught. I'm sure the RMTC Recent Rulings section is full of such trainers.

Penalties just aren't high enough. Not high enough to deter many trainers from "taking a shot." I've always maintained that since we are dealing with both purse money and betting money, criminal charges should be laid in many instances. Why isn't illegal drug use on horses defrauding the public?

Of course, some might argue that if it isn't being tested for, it is legal. Obviously not, or there would be no detention barns.

If you have a tip regarding a cheater in Ontario, the Ontario Racing Commission and Crimestoppers have teamed up. To make a completely anonymous call: 1-800-222-TIPS


Now For Something Much Lighter

Funny blog piece at ThatsAmoreStable.net: Seven Racetrack Characters To Avoid

I left the following comment: "I’m Talking To Himself Guy, except all the talking goes on in my head.

Another guy to avoid is Chronic Rooting Guy: He roots for his horse from the far turn right to end even if his horse is backing through the field at the head of the stretch."

A lot more comments on the piece can be found at Pace Advantage.

12 June 2010

I Told You So: Marsh Side Reinstated

I wrote this right after the Northern Dancer at Woodbine last fall:

Stewards Flipped The Coin And Got It Wrong In Northern Dancer
Unfortunately, on this Youtube video you don't get to see the head on (you can if go to Cal Racing or HPI replays), but the disqualification of Marsh Side was a bad call. There was no apparent bumping between Marsh Side and Quijano, and both jockeys were hitting with right hand while moving to the inside in tandem. If anything, Quijano would have squeezed Champs Elysee regardless of whether Marsh Side was in the race or not. Again, if the Stewards have to look at a race for more than two minutes, they should let the results stand.

The eventual winner had the common sense to get away from the rail as his jockey anticipated the tight quarters. Champs Elysee did get shut off, but I have a problem blaming Marsh Side for it.
I am pretty sure that this call will be overturned, and the bettor who picked the best horse in the race, will wind up getting screwed.
Well guess what?

Disqualified stakes winner reinstated

This disqualification was absolutely a horrible call. And it occurred on a race that had over $600,000 bet on it, plus it was the first leg of a Win 4 that had over $100,000 bet into it.

The question is how did the Stewards see something that didn't happen? It was a lengthy inquiry as well if memory serves me well.

This is why Stewards should be given 3 to 5 minutes tops to make a decision. And only use visual evidence. There is really no point to hear a jockey plead his or her case and give what must amount to a very biased opinion, possibly swaying a Steward or two.

The public wants decisions based on visual evidence. They can live with it. And given a choice, I'm sure most bettors could live with a horse being thrown out in an appeal, but this reinstating the best horse who was thrown out is simply (pardon my French) bull crap.



Another Good Article On Current Fort Erie Leading Rider Krista Carignan
Good to see a jockey go to the tapes in an effort to improve her game. And learning from a trip handicapping trainer isn't a bad move either.



Arlington All Source Handle Down 31%: Purses Slashed
Lets see: High Takeouts (Arlington Ranks 40th out of 69 tracks in HANA's Takeout Ratings). Restricted signal (not all ADWs have Arlington on the menu). A high distribution fee for its signal. And the restricting of ADWs to rebating a maximum of 2%, unless the bettor bets more than a million a year.

In today's betting environment, where many Horseplayers who bet good money are shopping around to give them the best chance to make a profit, the way Arlington is doing things is a recipe for disaster. And polytrack doesn't help, but by far, that isn't the main reason the track had such dismal results.

The Horseplayer has been awakened, and racetracks better realize this or suffer the consequences.

9 June 2010

Inspired By HANA, Pinnacle Race Course Lowers Takeout On Exotics

It isn't a shocker that racetracks are now starting to pay attention to the customer. Handle is dwindling, in May handle was down 8.3% from the previous year.

Simple Business 101 demands that when demand decreases, prices should come down. In horse racing, the price to the consumer is the track takeout. If a track is in trouble and they don't lower takeout, they aren't trying.

Pinnacle Race Course is trying. From Director of Pari-Mutuels/Simulcasting, Laura Bennett: "In response to the Horse Players Association of North America (HANA), we have lowered our take-out rates to the "lowest in Michigan".

More Money To The Players: "Win, Place, and Show are set by the State at 17%. All other pools are by track choice. We have lowered all our other offerings to 20% except Trifectas and Superfectas which have lowered to 25%.

Before this takeout drop, Pinnacle Race Course ranked 64th out of 69 tracks in North America for takeout score. Takeout rates were 17% WPS (unchanged), 20% on doubles (unchanged), and 27% on all other bets (they dropped the takeout by 7% on exactors, and 2% on all other bets).

With Tracknet dissolving, Pinnacle will be able to broaden their distribution to all ADWs.

I hope tracks like Fort Erie are taking note. Horseplayers who get more money back on each bet will last longer, and they are more apt to come back and play quicker. Lower takeouts also attract price sensitive players who may have avoided the track in the past.

Fort Erie takeouts are the second worst in North America. 16.95% on WPS, 26.2% on all other bets except for triactors which have a takeout of 28.2%. Their handle sucks this year. And it is a big year for them as they attempt to turn the joint around. If they don't address the track takeout issue soon, they simply aren't trying. 26.2% on exactors and doubles is simply obscene.

Lowering track takeout isn't an overnight fix, but the sooner they drop it, the quicker the process to build up their customer base begins.

To join HANA click here, it is free, and only takes a minute or two.


There Is Actually A Chance That Woodbine and All Ontario Racetracks Will Lower Takeout Soon

As mentioned here previously, Nick Eaves, the new top banana at Woodbine Entertainment is making it a quest to get the Ontario Horse Improvement Plan funded by slots and not by bets on horse races:

"He wants an immediate reduction in the takeout – 2 per cent on straight bets and 4 per cent on trifectas he calls “a start’’ – by removal of the current tax that goes to fund the Ontario Horse improvement Program, suggesting that worthy plan be funded by general slots revenues."

This would be great for Woodbine, which has some momentum going lately thanks to exposure at TVG and having their past performances being part of the Daily Racing Form Eastern edition in the USA. Woodbine also for the first time in at least recent history, can now be wagered on in Las Vegas. 83 Casinos can now put Woodbine on their betting menu.

If this does come to fruition, and Woodbine didn't come up with some excuse to not cut the takeout by the full amount of the HIP tax, Woodbine's takeout on WPS would be 14.95%, which would be the lowest in North America. 18.5% on Exactors and Doubles would tie them for the lowest in exactors (on the thoroughbred side), and tied for third for daily doubles.

I would hope that all harness tracks in Ontario, Ajax Downs and Fort Erie would also drop takeouts by the same amount as the HIP tax as well. But they could do what Woodbine did a few years when the government opted to lower taxation on wagers from over 8% to 1.3%, and foolishly keep takeout the same.


As for being able to allow bettors to play single sports games, I don't see the idea of Woodbine being a bookie flying. Unless it is set up in a parimutuel way, there is risk. And if they charge anything more than 10% juice, they won't attract enough action to make it worthwhile.


Bennett Liebman, has written a very good article in The Post (The New York Times Blog): Reasons For The Decline of Horse Racing.

All his reasons are significant. Although I will argue that his first reason cited, "Other Forms Of Gambling" is very much related to his ninth reason "Track Takeout" which could be combined to be the major reason for decline: Horse Racing's failure to compete with other forms of gambling.

As he points out, horse racing is a game of skill with an onerous collective takeout. There is no real reason for a newbie to get started, and little reason to stay:

"When you hear from the major rebate shops, that without the rebate, even their most skilled players almost never beat the takeout, you wonder why you play the game."

The bright side is that even smaller bettors can now can decent cash bonuses on their bets if they shop around.

There are additional reasons for the decline in horse racing. One that a commenter brought up is very valid, and it has to do with the short racing span of today's superstar horses. Frying 2 and 3 year olds, while taking the best out of competition and putting them in the breeding shed, has made it so that fan favorites come and go way too quickly.


Churchill Downs Inc. Has Completed The Merger of Youbet with Twinspires
It will be interesting to see what platform and features the keep, and which they get rid of in the near future.

2 June 2010

Can The Horse Racing Industry Get Together On Payoff Prices?

Yes, we all know that horse racing is one of the most dysfunctional industries on this planet today. Different State and Provincial laws don't help. Drug A is allowed in some States but not others. Some jurisdictions have new whipping rules, others do not. The list goes on. But can't racetracks agree on the way they report payoffs?

Guessing at what payoff prices or probable payoff prices are based on, are yet another needless inconvenience that horseplayers have to deal with.

Whether you are looking at the payoffs on TV from the direct Delaware feed, for example, which doesn't state the base used for Pick 3's and other exotic bets, or whether you are betting at your favorite ADW and looking at the results or probables, bettors should not have to do research to figure out what they are looking at.

How hard is it to get all racetracks on the same page on this one little thing? Does it take a Central Organization to be created first? Can Equibase perhaps get it done, or does the Horseplayers Association of North America have to save the day on this one?

An informal survey was started at Pace Advantage.

The question: How would you like to see all tracks report their payoff prices?

To date, one can see from the results that there is no consensus on what is most desirable and this could be the cause of the problem in the first place as various tracks are owned and run by a whole slew of different individuals and entities (not too many that are in tune with the customer base, I might add):

1.All Payoffs Should Be Based On $2 Wagers 20 27.03%
2.All Payoffs Should Be Based On $1 Wagers 15 20.27%
3.Whatever The Minimum Is For The Bets 22 29.73%
4.$2 Payoffs For WPS, EX, DD, P6 $1 for all other bets 10 13.51%
5.I don't really care 7 9.46%

Basing everything on $2 wagers leads to misleading prices on supers and other exotics where the pool might have been won with a 20 cent ticket.

Basing everything on $1 wagers leads to problems when it comes to $2 minimum bets like California Pick 6's or Moutaineer Daily Doubles. And of course, $1 WPS payouts won't fly with most bettors, at least at first.

Using the minimum bet is probably the idea that makes most sense. Almost everyone, if not everyone, knows when a 10 or 20 cent superfecta is offered, regardless of whether they had a $1 ticket or a dime ticket.

The fourth option is good as well. Historically we know bets are reported on the basis of $2 for WPS, Exactors and Doubles. And if everyone was on the same page regarding $1 Superfecta, Triactor, and Pick 3 payouts, it wouldn't take long for this method of reporting to be accepted.

I think any of the methods above, if announced, would be acceptable. But one thing is for sure, the way it works now is a complete pain in the butt for most horseplayers.



Bet Night Live On The Score

I'm in a giving mood today so I'm going to sort of help promote something *gasp* Woodbine is doing.

In an effort to get more people (especially young people) interested in betting on horse racing, they have tweaked their show on the Score to be more focused on betting horses.

I caught a bit of their harness edition on Monday night. I think adding Laura Diakun as a main host was a good move. She is cute enough to keep at least a few males interested in what she has to say.

It was a pretty good move to do a story on Serge Savard as well, since The Score obviously attracts a lot of hockey fans. We'll probably see a feature on Rod Seiling and whats his name, the guy who used to score lots of goals for the Maple Leafs and was also a regular bettor at Woodbine on his days off....oh yeah, Eddie Olczyk.

The contest they have is also a good one. Each Bet Live race night, horseplayers can bet $6 per race (in races 2 through 5) in an effort to win a $600 Grand Prize.
The $6 is actually bet into the pools, and it can be wagered on any betting type (I didn't read the rules completely, but the way I see it, that means Pick 3's and Pick 4's as well, which could cause a problem in declaring a winner before they go off the air). UPDATE, apparently the rules state WPS, Ex, Tris or Supers.

Another foreseeable problem is that the winner each night could be someone who just plays triactors. And lets face it, for newbies that could be very intimidating. And how long before newbies do an internet web search and find out that the TRACK TAKEOUT ON TRIACTORS AT WOODBINE IS A MIND BLOWING 27%?

One thing they are doing is funding each new HPI account with $24 to play the game first time around (for new customers only). This should attract a new customers.

But of course, the biggest problem is keeping the new customer, and getting them interested in playing the game long term. And this is just impossible thanks to high takeout rates. You need winners to entice today's young crowd. That is why Betfair and online poker have shown enormous growth.

There has to be a reason to learn how to pick horses and bet them. The game has to be perceived to be beatable, and false claims will not fly. There needs to be real long term winners, even if there are just a few. These winners will serve as a carrot stick for newbies.

Right now, there just isn't a reason for a potential new horseplayer to start up. Why should a person put in all the effort it takes to learn how to handicap and bet if they know they have no chance to win long term.

Horse racing is a great game. It attracts thinking gamblers, but along with the thinking, there needs to be an opportunity for long term victory.

Takeouts need to be reduced, especially at tracks like Woodbine and Fort Erie who clobber their customers with some of the highest takeouts in the industry.

To play in the contest, you need to enroll (only once for the year). Click here for details.



Woodbine Bias Report
Same old same old, though I'm noticing the rail is a bit better this year than last, winning jockeys don't really want to risk whether a bias is there or not.
Early speed still sucks at Woodbine most of the time.



Sans Sousi Appeal Denied
Last year, the day after the more humane whip was made mandatory in Ontario, Chantal Sutherland made a boo boo, and used the old whip.
Her horse wound up winning the race, however, two days later the Stewards disqualified the horse from purse monies.
I believe the ORC ruled correctly in this denial ruling. This type of thing probably will never happen again.
As far as the owners go, Sans Souci finally won the same condition earlier this year, so it could be argued that financially, they are more or less where they would be had Chantal used the correct whip in the first place.

Advertisement


INTRODUCTORY OFFER FROM HORSEPLAYERSBET.COM

BET $100 GET $50 DEPOSITED INTO YOUR ACCOUNT*

*Open up an account and deposit at least $100 in total. Once you wager $100, you will get $50 deposited into your account the very next day. You will also start receiving the regular Excellent Player Reward Bonuses on anything you bet in excess of the initial $100 going forward. Note: To earn the $50 Bonus you must wager at least $100 in total within 7 days of making your initial deposit.

CLICK LOGO TO OPEN A FREE ACCOUNT



Why Horseplayersbet.com:

* GREAT PLAYER REWARDS added to your account weekly.
* User friendly betting interface making wagering easy.
* FREE LIVE VIDEOS.
* FREE RACE REPLAYS.
* Wagering Online & by Phone.
* Great customer service.
* 100% Parimutuel.
* No membership or wagering fees.
* No fees on debit or credit card deposits of $100 or more.


Horseplayersbet.com, WHERE HORSEPLAYERS COME FIRST. SIGN UP TODAY

Player Reward Bonuses could be the difference to you as to whether you win in the long run playing horses or lose. The better the rewards, the more of a chance you have to beat the game. Sure, you still need skill and luck as well to succeed, but at HORSEPLAYERSBET.COM at least you have a fighting chance. And one thing is for sure, your money will last longer because of the PLAYER REWARD BONUSES you receive.

28 May 2010

Thoughts On Monmouth Park, So Far

I've been wrong so far regarding Monmouth Park on how much their handle would be up. I was thinking 50% when taking the fewer days and possible bigger field size. I wasn't taking into account that they would card more races though. All in all, they've pretty much doubled their handle after 2 days. Still a long way to go.

Here are a few thoughts on what I've seen so far:

Their takeout rate doesn't repel bettors, so the marketing that was put into this has successfully shifted some horseplayer money. They were ranked 10th by HANA when it comes to takeout score, with a 17% takeout rate on WPS, 19% on Ex's and DD's, a very low 15% on Pick 4's and their special 50 cent Pick 5. Triactors, supers, and pick 4's are still on the high side at 25%.

Field size is up a lot. It will be interesting if this trend continues. The $1500 paid workout concept definitely attracts entrants. Whether that is good for the horseplayer or not, it is very hard to say. Will sore horses (who can get past the vet) be entered more often to run instead of taking the needed healing time between races? It isn't for the bettor's interest if a horse is just entered with the sole purpose of picking up $1500.


The purses are deceptive. In lower level claiming races with big fields, only around 45% goes to the winner (because the purse amount includes the $1500 that gets paid out to those who finish in the bottom half or more of the field.


I think luring Garrett Gomez has helped gain followers from across the USA.


The quality of horse attracted isn't something to write home about. Using speed figures, I don't see allowance horses being a different caliber than what is found at other A tracks. Of course, the claiming events have horses running for deflated tags, which has been a great boon so far for the claiming game. So a $5,000 claimer is really a $10,000 claimer. It means that owners who have true 5 claimers, are just running for the $1,5000 in most cases.

The high amount of claiming going on right now at Monmouth is great for the game. When the lower priced horses establish a sale price, it means that all horses increase in value. When horses are being claimed, it means there are a lot of eyes checking out the entries looking for value. It also means that more connections are likely to go to the track.

What if Woodbine were to try this?

First off, their purses are great to begin with. However, giving out half of what Monmouth does right now is only yielding them around 25%-33% of the handle Monmouth is getting.

Woodbine's track takeout actually does hinder their popularity in a very large way. Check out this discussion about TVG and the feelings of the commenters regarding Woodbine's takeout.

Of course, there is also the dirt versus poly issue, and it is pretty clear that there are people that hate artificial surfaces.

I wonder what kind of affect guaranteeing $1000 or more a starter would have on Woodbine's entries. Their field size has usually been healthy, but this year especially, it seems that there are days where they are struggling to fill the card.

I've always said that more money should be given to lower level horses, and less to the allowance horses at Woodbine. Keeping more owners in the game is a key to growth. And again, having horses run for their true value or even less than their true value ignites claiming, which is good for the track, and good for horse racing.


I'm not a fan of the less is more philosophy. Racing's ultimate viability depends on having a the greatest number of people who make a living because of racing. Once dates are carved, a message is sent to the low level horsemen and owners to get out. And if enough get out, governments need to examine if the sport is necessary, and/or should be subsidized as much, or at all.

I strongly believe that pricing of the gamble needs to be experimented with, long before the industry experiments with cutting dates.


Race Night on The Score Tweaked To Bet Night

So they are going to try to focus on lessening the intimidation factor a newbie must overcome when it comes to handicapping races. That is good in theory. But this doesn't tackle the big issue: Why would anyone want to be a newbie handicapper/bettor in the first place?

It isn't like poker where there are examples of long term winning players. Nowadays, if someone even becomes remotely interested in betting on horses, they do a Google search, and find a site like mine which tells the truth, that without substantial rebates, you just aren't going to beat the horses in any significant way, if at all. In other words, there is absolutely no good reason for a newbie watching Bet Night to learn the game when Woodbine has a 27% takeout on triactors, and a 26.2% takeout on Pick 3's and supers.

I can see why someone would take up poker, but taking up horse racing through HPI and Woodbine? Gimme a break.

Note to Woodbine: You need visible winners. You need to reduce takeout.


Fort Erie still showing dismal handles, tiny field size

I really want Fort Erie to make it, but since they haven't budged on their absolutely ridiculous takeout rates, to me, they aren't really trying.

Sunday handle is a joke. Always has been though. They would do themselves a huge favor, and they would increase field size if they tweaked things a bit. Cut out Sundays, run 11 race cards on Monday and Tuesday, for a total of 24 a week, and with the extra purse money from eliminating 2 races, add that to the purses of the remaining 22 races.


It was reported to me that jockeys are being fined like crazy at Fort Erie for excessive whipping violations.

Jockeys can't whip more than twice in succession, and then there is a count in the stretch a jockey can't exceed either. Not sure how many times that is.

This is affecting bettors too. On Tuesday in the fourth race, apprentice jockey Neil Husbands got fined for excessive whipping in the stretch. His mount one the race by a small margin, beating out a horse ridden by Mike Mehak, who wasn't violating the rules. In other words, had Mehak violated the rules (some can say cheat) and Husbands had not, the results would most likely been reversed.

Should this type of violation lead to a disqualification? I think yes. If a jockey visibly uses a buzzer, and the stewards catch it in time, the horse would get thrown out I believe. There really isn't much of a difference in this case.

The amount of the fine is also of concern. It is apparently the same at Woodbine as it is at Fort Erie. A $200 fine at Fort Erie to a jockey that wins a race is a much greater chunk of their share of their pay check than it is at Woodbine in most cases. How about making it one half to 100% of what the jockey makes on the mount? That would be fairer, and it would be a pretty decent deterrent which will keep jockeys playing by the rules.

When it comes to whipping rules in general, I think bettors want jockeys to try to win if it take whipping 3 times in succession or 2 times. And it is probably true that some horses need to be whipped 3 times in succession, instead of 2.


Super Trainers Are A Deterrent To Horse Racing

Here is a case of a harness horse getting claimed and then knocking off seconds from his life time best. It is way too suspicious. The horse in question is aptly named Real Joke.

Guilty until proven innocent might be fine and dandy when it comes to the judicial system, but it is a great way to watch both watch honest horsemen and owners and gamblers disappear.

Too many drugs in the sport today. And there are always trainers who are one step ahead of the testing barn.

In Real Jokes case, it might have been the shortening of the hopples and the swimming that turned him around within a week or two, but most in the industry aren't buying it, nor should they.


NEWS OF THE WEIRD

At Presque Isle Downs, a guy who banned himself from the casino had to forfeit winnings of $2,000 on a slot machine, and he was charged with trespassing as well.

Imagine if he won a super jackpot instead? And did Presque Isle return any losses he had prior to winning? Probably not. The dude could only lose. Much like anyone who bets horses without rebates:)

26 May 2010

American Idol Leak And The Ramifications

This post has some relevance when thinking about the idea of exchange betting coming to North America.

I'll admit it, I like American Idol. Wouldn't dream of betting it, but that doesn't stop everyone from doing so. On Betfair, under special bets, one could place wagers on their American Idol selection, or book contestants they think will be voted off.

It just came to my attention that after what appeared to be a knockout performance last night, that Crystal Bowersox was trading as high as 8-1 today, and wound up closing at 3-1.

This means that nice guy Lee DeWyze will be announced as the winner within the next hour or so. It will shock the audience.

But what is worse is that this shows the dangers of betting exchanges, especially when a winner is known to at least someone prior to betting being closed. Every gamblers dream is to bet after knowing the results.

I'm for exchange betting, if done the right way. But whenever money is involved, larceny isn't far behind.

I'm still not 100% sure DeWyze will win.....but mostly because I can't believe he could possibly of received more votes than Mama Sox. But Betfair picked the upset winner last year too.

All it takes is one person to leak it out to a Betfair player, and it is free money.

It isn't like there is a disconnect between a certain judge and England.

21 May 2010

Horse Racing Needs To Try Optimum Pricing Before Cutting Dates

Nick Eaves was recently on Trot Radio, and what he had to say was not very popular amongst harness horsemen in Ontario at all. He has pretty much concluded 100% that harness racing (even Woodbine Mohawk) needs to cut dates because there just isn't enough demand for the product.

I'm not saying there isn't too much harness racing in Ontario today, but what gets me is that the element of pricing is huge when it comes to demand, especially today when there are all kinds of competition in the gambling industry.

How can a reasonably intelligent sounding man, who runs a gambling empire avoid Economics 101 so much? It isn't just Eaves, but his predecessor as well, and virtually almost every race track exec in North America.

To date, Woodbine Entertainment has not even attempted to find the OPTIMUM PRICE when it comes to takeout. Surely, a company that sells a product (gambling) in a competitive environment has to understand that at different track takeouts, you end up with different bottom lines.

Take McDonald's for instance, they know that if they charge $3 for a Big Mac, they make more money in the long run than if the price was $6 or even $1. This happens with experience of moving prices up and down.

The slot industry has found out the OPTIMUM PRICE as well through trial and error. Of course, it can be a little different in one place than another, depending on the customer base, but it generally always falls between a house take of 5% to 10%.

At 15% or 20%, even though the patrons mostly don't have a clue about the slot payback rates, slot operators make less money in the long run because players go broke quicker, which works towards giving them a stronger negative experience. After all it is gambling, and if you walk into any place with a bankroll and lose it too quick, you'll find other ways to bet or quit betting altogether.

The longer a player lasts, the more apt they are to expose friends and family to their gambling habit. This increases the bottom line of the casino....or hopefully, the racetrack when they finally discover OPTIMAL PRICING. Again, lowering takeout in horse racing is a long term thing. It isn't an overnight savior. It took 30 years for racing to find the bottom, now it is time for it to rise up again. Lowering takeout will help the momentum.

Seriously, how can Keeneland have takeouts between 16%-19% and Woodbine have takeouts between 17%-27% if OPTIMAL PRICING has been attempted?


THE COST TO PUT ON THE SHOW FALLACY

One of the biggest crocks heard is that racing can't drop takeouts because the price of putting on the show is too high.

Takeout price and the cost to run a track are two separate entities. The best way to illustrate this is using a slot operation.

Slot operations are not cheap to run. Many are open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and employs many full time staff (employee benefits, maternity leave, etc.). It takes a lot of electricity to run these places as well. Lets say it costs $25 million a year to operate a casino, and lets also assume they at least break even at every hour of operation, so there is no need to cut hours. The casino has an average house take of 8% on their slots. This means, to break even slot players must bet at least $312,500,000 a year. At 8% they do find that people bet $450 million a year (yielding a profit of $11 million). However, at 10% where the break even point would only be $250 million, they find that people bet only $330 million, which yields a profit of $8 million.


Now what does the cost of the operations have to do with how much people will bet? Simply, it doesn't mean squat. The slot operator, using OPTIMUM PRICING, realize that they make more money at 8% versus a 10% hold. The cost of the show is irrelevant, it could be $25 million, $10 million, or $35 million, it just doesn't matter. It is all about the the takeout rate or hold rate, and how much the customer loses collectively at different hold rates.

More of today's customers are aware of track takeout when it comes to horse racing, but even if they weren't, the psychology of losing too fast will always be there. Horse racing needs to attempt to find the OPTIMUM PRICE point. Cutting dates first is just giving up without even trying, and just putting a band aid on the demand problem.

In the Trot Radio interview, Eaves also made mention of the HIPS 2% (4% on triactors) tax that increases the takeout, a horseplayer has to pay. I think it is a great idea to change the way HIPS is funded, and take it out of slots instead. A 2% decrease on WPS and exactors and doubles would be great, if Woodbine can pull it off. A 14.95% takeout on WPS would be the lowest in the land, giving them a fantastic competitive edge.

More importantly, getting rid of it off the parimutuel side would enable Woodbine to experiment with other takeout reductions more easily as well.

I don't get his churn comment? Of course, in the old days when there were fewer exotics, and a lower collective takeout because of it, churn would be higher. But to say churn isn't that good anymore is a bit misleading. Horseplayers generally bet until it is all gone. They might play other tracks, but that is how it works.

Also, the polytrack has led to bigger average payouts (thanks to bigger fields and the fact the polytrack creates more chaotic results than dirt), so fewer people are getting money to churn. So it might take the player who cashes a big super or tri longer to churn back, but they generally do so over time (the churn is coming back from fewer sources than in the old days). And the best churn days are when exactors pay $20 and winners pay a fin. But again, with most of the money coming from simulcast or ADW, people will generally bet the next race coming with the money they cash, regardless where they cash it, so sometimes Woodbine benefits, and sometimes it doesn't. It should be a wash in the end regarding timing of players cashing and betting back.

When you take out $25 out of every $100 bet versus $16, there is going to be a lot less churn regardless. That is the bottom line.


HANA at Keeneland On Youtube
I'm proud to say HANA is getting the exposure it deserves. We are starting to get a seat at the table, and I think our efforts are beginning to pay off, as tracks have actually come to us and ask for suggestions (and why not, we represent the customers, the people who pay for the purses and the track operations):



Incidentally, HPITV viewers may recognize Mike Maloney, as he has shown up on a video that HPITV airs having to do with handicapping.


Advertisement

MONMOUTH PARK'S BIG SEASON IS JUST ABOUT TO BEGIN: WATCH AND BET IT AT HORSEPLAYERSBET.COM AND EARN GREAT PLAYER REWARD BONUSES AS WELL

INTRODUCTORY OFFER FROM HORSEPLAYERSBET.COM

BET $100 GET $50 DEPOSITED INTO YOUR ACCOUNT*

*Open up an account and deposit at least $100 in total. Once you wager $100, you will get $50 deposited into your account the very next day. You will also start receiving the regular Excellent Player Reward Bonuses on anything you bet in excess of the initial $100 going forward. Note: To earn the $50 Bonus you must wager at least $100 in total within 7 days of making your initial deposit.

CLICK LOGO TO OPEN A FREE ACCOUNT



Why Horseplayersbet.com:

* EXCELLENT PLAYER REWARDS added to your account weekly.
* User friendly betting interface making wagering easy.
* FREE LIVE VIDEOS.
* FREE RACE REPLAYS.
* Wagering Online & by Phone.
* Great customer service.
* 100% Parimutuel.
* No membership or wagering fees.
* No fees on debit or credit card deposits of $100 or more.


Horseplayersbet.com, WHERE HORSEPLAYERS COME FIRST. SIGN UP TODAY

Player Reward Bonuses could be the difference to you as to whether you win in the long run playing horses or lose. The better the rewards, the more of a chance you have to beat the game. Sure, you still need skill and luck as well to succeed, but at HORSEPLAYERSBET.COM at least you have a fighting chance. And one thing is for sure, your money will last longer because of the PLAYER REWARD BONUSES you receive.

13 May 2010

Fort Erie By The Numbers So Far

It is way too early to figure out if Fort Erie is going in the right direction, but it seems, so far, they are going in the same direction despite a publicized new attitude and new management.

On the bright side, total handle is up 3% from $2,543,865 to $2,627,135 according to Equibase numbers. They have had one extra race this year as opposed to last year (why they added the race on a Sunday, their worst handle day and not Monday or Tuesday, is a complete mystery to me), so per race handle is only up 0.7% ($64,076 vs. $63,596 last year). There is a trend right now as bigger rebated horseplayers are starting to shift some of their action from high distribution fee tracks (like Tracknet tracks) to tracks that sell their signal for a more reasonable rate, and Fort Erie is in a position to at least hold their own thanks to that.

Live handle is pretty lousy right now (down 12.6%). Only $284,390 has been bet live this year versus $325,520 last year at this time, despite the one extra race this year. To be fair, live handle is down just about everywhere, but in Fort Erie's case, live bettors are extremely important, and they have a huge impact on sustaining current race days and purses, as horsemen get a much bigger cut on horseplayers who bet live (whether it is Fort Erie or another track on the simulcast menu).

Field size has been a problem at most tracks this year as well. Keeneland dropped to under 8 horses a race this spring compared to over 9 the year before. Fort Erie's field size average is down from 7.87 horses a race last year at this time to 7.48 horses a race. Horseplayers generally bet more, the bigger the field size. They got hurt a bit on Tuesday, as 3 horses were vet scratched in the last race, reducing the field size to 5. Their last two races on weekdays, are their money makers, as they run up against the least competition at that time.

It wasn't a great move to move post times to 1:30, instead of 1:45 last year (if anything, it should be 2 PM post times on weekdays), especially if they are only running 8 races on Monday and Tuesday. They need every edge they can get. That is why they should run the first race on Saturday at around 12:20 so as to get the horseplayers first betting dollars from across North America.

Field size and handle numbers tend to increase considerably as the year goes on. Last year, field size average at Fort Erie wound up at 8.22 a race, while they averaged $85,439 in handle per race.

Lets Compare Fort Erie To Finger Lakes, Shall We?

There were three dates that apples to apples comparisons to Fort Erie can be made this year (Kentucky Derby Day and the past Mondays and Tuesdays). Unfortunately, Finger Lakes doesn't readily publish live handle so I can only compare total handle.

In the three comparison days, total handle at Finger Lakes was $3,887,701 this year compared to $3,488,672 last year (an increase of 11.1%). $143,989 has been bet per race compared to $129,210 for the corresponding days from last year. Finger Lakes appears to be benefiting as well from the shift in wagering being done by rebate players.

Field size has rose from 7.22 horses per race to 7.51 horses per race. For those three days, Fort Erie's field size dropped from 8.16 to 7.46 (still around Finger Lakes new number).

Last year, Finger Lakes averaged $113,308 a race in handle for the year with a 7.79 field size.

When comparing the per race handle, one has to ask what Finger Lakes does differently than Fort Erie.

As a handicapper who uses speed figures, if anything, Fort Erie has the same or even slightly higher quality on average than Finger Lakes does.

Finger Lakes runs a lot of State Bred races, including State Bred claiming races. These races do attract horses with lower speed figures most of the time. However, as a horseplayer, I find these races to be really good races to handicap, and I tend to bet more on them, especially if the field size is 7 or greater. Usually there are a couple of standouts, but there are usually fringe longshots, who lose by double digits in open races but have a chance against the lesser competition.

The median average purse at Fort Erie was $10,422 versus $9,500 at Finger Lakes, but average purses given out per day at Finger Lakes was $122,564 versus $105,103 at the Fort. Finger Lakes runs an extra race per day than Fort Erie, and it has more allowance and Stake races, though I have never seen any evidence that B Allowance and B Stake races attract any more handle than claiming races with good field size.

Finger Lakes is probably simulcast at more places than Fort Erie, including all the NY OTBs. This gives Finger Lakes a big edge if true.

Finger Lakes is not surrounded by gambling competition like Fort Erie is, but since I don't know the live handle figures, it is difficult to analyze the impact.

I find Fort Erie races in general to be more exciting, and less predictable most of the time. This can be a good thing, but also can be a bad thing when you start talking takeout.

Comparing track takeouts

Fort Erie WPS 16.95%, Triactors 28.2%, All other bets 26.2% (including exactors and doubles.....yes, including exactors and doubles.

Finger Lakes WPS 18%, Exactors and Doubles 20%, All other bets 25%.

Finger Lakes wins this comparison hands down. You can't take 26.2% on exactors and doubles especially, and expect people to come back so quickly, if at all.

In the old days (1960's and 70's) when there was no simulcasts, hardly any exotics, a live horseplayer could only play around 8 races, and mostly had to play WPS (at takeouts of less than 16% back then, I believe). Plenty left the building with money on them to go the next day. This kept the crowds in the game. There were even some winners around, and there was a buzz that the game could actually be beat.

What Fort Erie does, with their high takeouts is make it impossible to get gamblers enthused or motivated to come back the next day. It is almost like they've given up. They also underpay customers on simulcast wagers. This is not good, and it gives punters even less of a reason to come to the track.

They still assume that the focus is on a mindless crowd, and the key is to just bring them to the track. Great. Get them to the track, but you have to try to let them leave with something too, so that they might just come back.

Horseplayers are not typical gamblers. Horse racing attracts thinking gamblers. And when it becomes over apparent that one has no chance gambling, they move on to other types of gambling that have much lower vig.

Back to the comparison. Finger Lakes does not race on Sundays. Sundays are horrible handle days for Fort Erie, but they need to run at least one weekend day so as to allow the 9-5ers and their families a chance to make it to the track, including of course small owners. However, with the high takeout, and the hit and run mentality that is prevalent at most tracks these days, getting newbies or casual players to become more than that is futile. Might as well scrap Sundays for Wednesdays.

I really want Fort Erie to survive, but they have to do things differently in order to attract their bread and butter: THE HORSEPLAYER.

I don't see too many of the suggestions I wrote about in Fort Erie, The Future Is Now, being implemented as yet.


Rick Cowan Hired To Supervise and Manage Fort Erie
The biggest piece of the management puzzle has been filled at Fort Erie. Rick Cowan, who brings a vast amount of experience with him, will now be running the joint.

He ran Woodbine back in the early 80's, at a time when they didn't have slots, and were experiencing enhanced competition from the Blue Jays, lotteries, and finally charity casinos. The crowds were ample during Cowan's reign.

I think a really good choice was made.

Just a couple of things though. Fort Erie needs anyone who wants to bet to bet, including employees, and ties are not condoned by most Fort Erie residents:)


HANDICAPPING FORT ERIE

A certain racetrack analyst at Fort Erie likes to stress a certain angle: Give horses a race before you bet them at Fort Erie if they are coming from Woodbine. It just didn't seem right to me, so I had Pull The Pocket get me some data using Jcapper software.

Here are the key finds:

When a horse ships in from another track to Fort Erie, and they have the top rated speed figs, they win at a 25% clip. The win rate is good, but the return is horrible, as these horses are vastly over bet and return 55 cents for every dollar wagered.

If you bet all shippers making their first start at the Fort, you would lose over 26 cents on every dollar bet with a 14.5% win percentage. This is a strong loss considering takeout should only cause a 17 cent loss on the dollar.

If the shipper came from Woodbine, the first race at Fort Erie produces a 15% win rate, and if you bet them all, you would lose over 28 cents for every dollar wagered.

There is a slight increase when a horse makes its second start at Fort Erie. Win percentage goes up to 14.8%, while the return on investment (ROI) goes up to 75.6%. Still, losing 24 cents on the dollar is no way to beat the game.

What this tells me is that value is to be had by ignoring Woodbine horses who wound up becoming Fort Erie horses. First start, second start, hardly a difference.

They do OK on their fifth start (you only lose 10 cents for every dollar wagered), and you can actually show a profit if you bet them on their 11th start at the track after they shipped (a profit of 4%).

6 May 2010

The Apprentice: Woodbine And Fort Erie Are Full Of Them

I don't recall a year when the jockey colonies at Woodbine and Fort Erie had so many apprentice riders.

I imagine the purses offered at Woodbine has made the idea of being a jockey more of a goal to people who weigh less than 115 pounds. But with so many on the scene this year, many are going to find that making a living is going to be next to impossible.

And when it comes to weight making a difference, weight off probably matters least at Woodbine compared to other tracks in North America. Woodbine races are won by finesse and timing more than anything else.

Very few races are won gate to wire on polytrack surfaces. When a horse gets a clear lead, weight off is an added bonus on dirt tracks, and as long as the apprentice is able to control the mount, the odds increase that the horse will make it to the wire on top. And in route races, weight off matters more, but usually when it comes to dirt strips instead of grass or poly.

At Woodbine, jockeys like Chantal Sutherland, Patrick Husband, Eurico Da Silva, and Emile Ramsammy cannot be bettered by taking weight 99.9% of the time.

So far this year, as expected, Omar Moreno is leading all apprentices at Woodbine in starts and wins. Though he is winning only at around 11%, he is hovering around 50% in the money. He is definitely the go to apprentice so far, for trainers looking for an extra edge. He loses his bug status in the fall.

I like what I've seen so far from Betty Jo Williams. She seems to have the patience of a seasoned polytrack jockey like Chantal Sutherland.

Ryan Pacheco's tiny frame makes him a perfect candidate to have a very good apprentice year. Again, he has been impressive so far with limited mounts.

Brian Cheyne and Carolyn Duquette both lost their 10 pound bug early in the meet, and I expect them to struggle getting mounts at Woodbine. It is very hard to gain momentum and with that, the extra experience needed to become a colony mainstay when you are the 4th top rated apprentice or less on any circuit.

Terry Husbands didn't wow anyone last year when he had a chance to be the go to apprentice. He got a late start this year and is winless in less than 10 races. Another Husbands (Neil) is brand spanking new to riding in parimutuel
horse races. Other 10 pound bugs include Marni Williams, Joe Sabetti and Dean Stimpson. 5 pound bug Beth Wyard also accepts mounts at Woodbine.

There are more apprentices. With Fort Erie starting up, highly touted Bradley Wilson is back in the saddle. Cory Spataro, Mike Mehak, and Eric Edwards are also looking to make a name for themselves at the Fort. Lots of Woodbine based apprentices make the trek across the QEW to ride at Fort Erie when they have no mounts at Woodbine or when Woodbine is dark. So far, in the first 16 races at Fort Erie, the only apprentice to win has been Neil Husbands, who got his first career win on Sunday.

Apprentices who don't get good momentum have it tough. Many don't get the chance to develop and it is hard to gain momentum when one gets lesser mounts.


Former Fort Erie announcer Peter Kyte (still the announcer at Western Fair) has a blog: The Pete Sheets.
He can sing too:

I wonder what Simon Cowell would say about his performance?



Fort Erie handle sucked on the weekend. They did nothing to address the fact that they have one of the worst track takeouts in North America, so going forward, I can't see things improving. On track horseplayers can't possibly last when betting into exactor and double pools that have a 26.2% takeout. When they don't last very long, they are less likely to come back any time soon. Might as well just have someone at the entrances with a Hoover vacuuming out customer's pockets.

With handles up just about everywhere on Kentucky Derby day, Fort Erie was down 7% on live handle and over 20% off track. On Sunday, they were down 20% live, but were up 12% off track (still, total handle for Sunday was a mere $422,000, better than last year....but they can do a heck of a lot better if they understood the bettor.


Tampa Bay Downs, a racetrack that has been reducing takeout over the years, showed a 5% gain for the year, bucking the industry trend this year. Here is a track that has gone pretty much doubled handle over the last 8 years. They now do over $4 million a day (almost double than what Woodbine does). Tampa Bay still needs to reduce takeout on triactors and superfectas (25.9%).

Industry handle in down over 8% on the year, thanks to April not being as bad as the first three months. Being down 2.5% in April is no reason to celebrate nor is it something that should cause any racing exec any relief. Horse racing handle should NEVER drop. Every year, there are more and more people on this planet and every year the value of a dollar bill decreases at least somewhat (unless we ever have negative inflation).

The Kentucky Derby numbers improved. Handle was up, so were the TV ratings (in fact, they were the highest they've been in 18 years). Now this could be reason for some optimism. But if horse racing only attracts handles on big days, it still doesn't bode well for the industry which depends on day to day grinding by trainers, owners, and bettors.


Woodbine handle has been trending up lately thanks to TVG coverage in larger fields.
They desperately need to do something to keep customers though, and this can only be achieved by reducing takeouts.


Calvin Borel's stretch whipping of Super Saver didn't impress Stan Bergstein in the least.

His "overuse" of the stick now makes The Onion staff look like Sages. They put this video out prior to the Derby:

Who is the best horse flogger alive? Liam Hollins or Calvin Borel?



Shame on Woodbine for paying less on place and show bets on Tioga Downs (which has a takeout reduction experiment going right now). As expected they are paying a lot less on triactors and supers, but place and show? There is something terribly wrong with what they are doing.

30 April 2010

RRRRROAR! I LIKE AMERICAN LION IN THE DERBY


The American Lion may have gone extinct 11,000 years ago, but I can see a comeback in the making tomorrow in the Kentucky Derby.

I have a hard time believing this horse is going to go off between 30-1 and 50-1. His speed figure going into this race is as high as any of the competition. The seven post is probably as good as it gets in a 20 horse race. He is bred for the Derby. According to Brisnet distance number, American Lion's 118 is the highest in the field.

In his last race, The Illinois Derby, he did the last eighth of a mile in 13 seconds into a 30 mile per hour wind. Granted his early pace was slower, but like I stated, the final time is relatively equal to or better than the entire Derby field's best efforts. He beat his nearest rival by almost 3 lengths, drawing clear in the end. There was another gap of 11 lengths to the third place finisher. I don't expect him on the lead, and his last race sets him up perfectly to be placed in a stalking position behind the horses that will be out gunning early.

He is one of three horses in the race who are one for one (undefeated) on a dirt strip, and he looks like he is improving with every effort.

There is a major concern, but this is true of every horse in the race, and that is flood warnings have been predicted for the area tomorrow. Lions aren't fond of water, but this American Lion has the second highest Brisnet "off track" number in the race.

To round out the exactor, I like Super Saver. Good speed numbers. I think his running style is a detriment for this race though (he should be very vulnerable in the stretch unless he inherits a big lead). He will probably go the least distance of any horse in the race, as he looks to have enough speed to comfortably get to the rail (where Calvin Borel loves to ride).

Other contenders include the probably favorite Lookin At Lucky (who is also one for one on the dirt). Noble's Promise has a shot too. He has been turned away three times by Lookin At Lucky, but the three hole should allow him to have a great trip, and he looks to be ready for a peak effort, and he'll be picking them off late. And it is hard to leave Awesome Act out of the exotics. He is bred for the distance and figures to be charging late as well.

Free DRF Past Performances For Kentucky Derby

Bettor Beware: Obligatory
If you bet on Churchill Downs through HPI or a Canadian track or OTB, be prepared to get royally ripped off if you hit a pick 3, pick 4, triactor, or superfecta. The track takeout at Churchill downs for these bets is 19%, but Woodbine pays them off as if the takeout is 27%. This means, for example, that a $2000 payoff at Churchill Downs will only get you a little over $1800 in Canada. Where does the rest of the money go? Woodbine keeps it. They are your partner on these wagers whether you like it or not. And they don't even put in their share of the bet to begin with.

Woodbine must have a code name for their customers: Ben Dover.

I'm hoping Woodbine eventually does the right thing, but so far they are turning a blind eye to public complaints.


Fort Erie Opens Tomorrow
Big fields. Looks like new Racing Secretary John Whitson has been doing his job properly so far. Francine Villeneuve is back. Jockey Krista Carignan is going to be busy. She has a mount in every race on the opening day card. Agent Scott Lane must be working overtime.

It is still a shame that new management hasn't addressed Fort Erie's embarrassingly high takeout. 26.2% on exactors and doubles is no way to keep people in the stands.

Speaking of track takeout. Tioga Downs season begins tomorrow as well. Tioga Downs is a track that gets it. After a few conversations with HANA (Horseplayers Association of North America), they decided to lower their takeout as much as they could. Their new takeout rates are 15% on WPS, 17% on exactors and doubles, and 21% on all other bets. They now have the lowest track takeout of any track in North America, and the same is true of their exactor takeout.

They have been getting excellent feedback for their efforts, and I expect to see a good increase in handle. It must be stated though, that the true effects of a takeout increase or decrease doesn't rely on the public noticing it and either gravitating to the track or avoiding the track, no, it is a long term scenario, where the gamblers psychology is either positively or negatively impacted over time. The lower the takeout, the longer the player lasts, the more bang they have for their buck, the more likely they are to return quickly and more often.

In conjunction with HANA, Tioga Downs will be putting out expert picks in a contest called The Pen and Micro-Chip Challenge. Who is going to pick more winners at Tioga? Seasoned pen and paper handicappers, or computer generated picks?
A special thanks goes out to Mike (the owner of Pace Advantage) for his contribution to the contest, and TrackMaster for supplying free computer generated selections.

BIG POOL ALERT
At Beulah Park tomorrow, there is a Pick 6 mandatory payout happening. Going in, there is over $445,000 in the pool. The beauty of it is that it is a 25 cent base bet. One can build a ticket of 2 horses a race for only $16 in total.

If you reside in the right jurisdiction, you can play the Beulah Fortune Pick 6 here (Tioga Downs is also on the menu). By post time of the third race, when the Pick 6 begins, the pool could be close to a million.


"The Kid" Gets His 15 Minutes Of Fame
14 year old handicapper from New Yawk who has a Youtube channel says his favorite track is Woodbine. I think he needs a lesson in track takeout:)

Advertisement

INTRODUCTORY OFFER FROM HORSEPLAYERSBET.COM

BET $100 GET $50 DEPOSITED INTO YOUR ACCOUNT*

*Open up an account and deposit at least $100 in total. Once you wager $100, you will get $50 deposited into your account the very next day. You will also start receiving the regular Excellent Player Reward Bonuses on anything you bet in excess of the initial $100 going forward. Note: To earn the $50 Bonus you must wager at least $100 in total within 7 days of making your initial deposit.

CLICK LOGO TO OPEN A FREE ACCOUNT



Why Horseplayersbet.com:

* EXCELLENT PLAYER REWARDS added to your account weekly.
* User friendly betting interface making wagering easy.
* FREE LIVE VIDEOS.
* FREE RACE REPLAYS.
* Wagering Online & by Phone.
* Great customer service.
* 100% Parimutuel.
* No membership or wagering fees.
* No fees on debit or credit card deposits of $100 or more.


Horseplayersbet.com, WHERE HORSEPLAYERS COME FIRST. SIGN UP TODAY

Player Reward Bonuses could be the difference to you as to whether you win in the long run playing horses or lose. The better the rewards, the more of a chance you have to beat the game. Sure, you still need skill and luck as well to succeed, but at HORSEPLAYERSBET.COM at least you have a fighting chance. And one thing is for sure, your money will last longer because of the PLAYER REWARD BONUSES you receive.

25 April 2010

Handle Talk; Poker Rooms At Racetracks

HANDLE NEWS

Sunland Park bucks the trend. Their handle went up 5% over last year. With the industry down around 10% compared to last year, that is quite an improvement.

Hawthorne's daily handle was up 4% in March compared to March last year. They canned running on Thursdays and Sundays, and ran Tuesdays and Wednesdays instead (days when competition is lighter). Woodbine should consider Mondays and Tuesdays (though Fort Erie wouldn't like it), as they need to race when competition isn't around.

Hawthorne does pretty well, considering they are ranked around 35th in total purse distributions per day, they rank 18th in total handle per race. Woodbine ranks 5th in purse distribution per day, but ranks below Hawthorne (19th) in total handle per race.

Keeneland handle dipped 7%. They did outperform the industry, but field size plagued them this year, as the dropped from over 9 horses a race to under 8.

I don't have data on Gulfstream Park field size, but they bucked the trend as well, as out of state handle rose 5%, giving them a 4% increase over last year. Gulfstream Park has relatively low takeouts and higher than average field size (according to last year's stats). They also made a good move in changing the date of the Florida Derby and got lucky with some weekend cancellations of California tracks.

With Keeneland done for the spring, Woodbine had very good handle day (for Woodbine) yesterday, as over $2.8 million was bet.  Big fields dominated the card.

Thanks to yesterday, their last five racing days have shown an increase of .5% over last year, which means their handle woes have been cut in half, from being down 20%, to being down only 10% from last year at this time.  Still a cause for concern, as they didn't have the deal with TVG in place until the summer, and that helped them out last year immensely.


There seems to be some sort of trend being established. Tracks that are available at all ADWs in the US are doing well, as long as they don't overcharge for their distribution.

Keeneland charges higher than average fees for their signal, the same with the California tracks, and of course the Tracknet tracks (which also restrict rebates even more), and throw in Woodbine too. And when it comes to availability, none are available everywhere, and what I mean by everywhere, are the ADWs that offer rebates to horseplayers.

They are shooting themselves in the foot that way, but also by charging larger fees, they restrict what can be offered to the horseplayer. Track takeout isn't as consequential to rebate players as the fees a track charges for the signal. And what is happening now, is there is a shift going on, as price conscious players are now betting more on tracks that allow for a lower net takeout (track takeout minus rebate) than these A tracks that have a higher net takeout. Field size still will attract the price conscious players in many cases though, so there are exceptions.

The only growing part of the industry right now, is the ADW sector, and to be more specific, the ADW market that gives out rebates. Rebates are not a bad thing. They keep the horseplayer in the game longer, and this helps maintain and most probably grow the game, as many of these players believe they can beat the game because some actually do. The problem is that the industry doesn't want to publicize this because it is an admission that takeout is way too high.

So tracks like Sunland and Hawthorne are seeing handle rise while most high signal tracks are seeing handles continuing to drop.

Takeout still matters a lot. Players need to stay in the game as long as possible in order to grow the game. Horseplayers who go to the track and bet live races are the best asset for growth horse racing has, but they are the ones who pay on average the highest net takeout (aside from the yo yo's who bet at NY OTB's and mindlessly pay the surcharge).

Fort Erie takes 26.2% on exactors and doubles from their live players and then they wonder where the players went. That is like McDonald's charging $8 for Big Macs and wondering where the customers are. The more a horseplayer wins, the more they bet back. The longer the player lasts, more likely the player is getting hooked. The more a horseplayer leaves the track with, the more likely the horseplayer will return ASAP.


Ajax Downs' Nick Coukos Tries To Make A Case About Turning Poker Players Into Horseplayers

Coukos believes that by allowing poker rooms at the track, that there is a shot that some players will crossover.

They have poker rooms at some tracks in the US, and handle is down down down. There is no evidence to show this will remotely work.

Boils down to takeout. House take in poker is much lower than takeout at the ponies. There are visible winners at poker too. Long term winners. Winners who made enough money to move from their parent's basement to a mansion. Not so when it comes to horse racing.

Poker player's bankrolls last much longer than pony players too. Even if you get a poker player to cross over, it won't last most of the time.

Nick Coukos is not a bad handicapper, but he admits that he went from being a poker player to a horse player and back to being a poker player now. Players go where they have the biggest bang for their buck, and it seems Coukos is doing pretty well at poker. He just won a tournament at Caesars in Vegas, beating out 194 opponents and going home with prize money worth 15 Grand.

Almost makes me want to throw away the racing form and take up poker. Note: I used to play hold em in my early 20's a few nights a week for a good spell. It was very enjoyable, but not as stimulating for me as horse racing is....but way less expensive (potentially).

Click here for some comments from Pace Advantage on the idea of poker rooms at tracks.

There is probably more of a danger that horseplayers will crossover and become poker players. And the tracks can't afford to lose more horseplayers.


Jim Day: From Boom To Bust
Sad thing is with the Ontario Sired Program, this kind of thing shouldn't happen. But there is no out for Ontario sired horses. Either they win allowance races or they become worthless. State bred claiming races are desperately needed to help the breeders, owners, and trainers of Ontario bred horses.


This video put a smile on my face especially the part with the giant ball. I like the music too(HT Joanie D at Pace Advantage):


Advertisement

INTRODUCTORY OFFER FROM HORSEPLAYERSBET.COM

BET $100 GET $50 DEPOSITED INTO YOUR ACCOUNT*

*Open up an account and deposit at least $100 in total. Once you wager $100, you will get $50 deposited into your account the very next day. You will also start receiving the regular Excellent Player Reward Bonuses on anything you bet in excess of the initial $100 going forward. Note: To earn the $50 Bonus you must wager at least $100 in total within 7 days of making your initial deposit.

CLICK LOGO TO OPEN A FREE ACCOUNT



Why Horseplayersbet.com:

* EXCELLENT PLAYER REWARDS added to your account weekly.
* User friendly betting interface making wagering easy.
* FREE LIVE VIDEOS.
* FREE RACE REPLAYS.
* Wagering Online & by Phone.
* Great customer service.
* 100% Parimutuel.
* No membership or wagering fees.
* No fees on debit or credit card deposits of $100 or more.


Horseplayersbet.com, WHERE HORSEPLAYERS COME FIRST. SIGN UP TODAY

Player Reward Bonuses could be the difference to you as to whether you win in the long run playing horses or lose. The better the rewards, the more of a chance you have to beat the game. Sure, you still need skill and luck as well to succeed, but at HORSEPLAYERSBET.COM at least you have a fighting chance. And one thing is for sure, your money will last longer because of the PLAYER REWARD BONUSES you receive.

20 April 2010

The Future Is Now At Fort Erie

"We all are aware that if we do the same as last year, we'll fail," Jim Thibert, CEO of The Fort Erie Live Racing Consortium said last week in a press conference.

Actually he could have picked out any year since Fort Erie Race Track first opened the doors in 1895.

Fort Erie season begins on May 1st, and already, they are getting in the batter's box behind in the count as horse racing handle is off over 10% this year in North America.

Handle at Woodbine is off over 15% so far this year, and Santa Anita just announced their handle was down 11% during their latest meet.

Field size might have something to do with it. Also, tracks with higher signal distribution fees like Woodbine and Santa Anita, and Tracknet tracks, have been getting whacked a bit more because price sensitive players have been shifting their action to where they can get the best net takeout after rebate. If the latter is true, that could be a plus for Fort Erie.

I was looking back at my notes pertaining to improving the betting handle at Fort Erie. When I first moved to Fort Erie back in 2001, I co owned quite a few horses. I had major interest in keeping the then high purses high, and approached Eddie Lynn, Nordic's GM at that time, with a list of close to 25 things they could do to attract more bettors.

The lack of interest I received was mind numbing, but then again, it was hard to blame him. Nordic was rolling in profits from the casino back then, and horse racing was and still is to them, a necessary evil.

I even mentioned competition from Buffalo which will most likely cause slots profits to go down, to which Lynn laughed, saying something like Buffalo can't do anything right, that they are inept across the border.

I saw I was getting nowhere, so after around 8 items on the list, I shook his hand and left his office.

Fast forward to today, and the days of giving away $175,000 a day in purses and running 120 plus days a year are long gone.

Of the items on my list, only one was realized. Last year, Fort Erie changed post times to 1:45, though that isn't exactly what I would have suggested.

So here is a revised list of what I believe Fort Erie needs to do to not only survive but to prosper for many years to come:

1. LOWER THE TRACK TAKEOUT: Fort Erie cannot realistically expect to survive unless they lower their takeout rates. Fort Erie ranks 67th out of 69 tracks when it comes to takeout rate. Did you know that 10 of the 14 tracks that have the lowest takeout rates, do not have alternative forms of gambling? Tracks with slots should have the lowest takeout rates in order to compete with the slots side.

If Joe Gambler loses $200 at slots (meaning he bet over $2000 on average), the track gets $20, and the horsemen get $20. If the same gambler loses $200 at the track on average (meaning he bet around $1000 on average), the track gets over $90, as does the horsemen.

Here are the rates Fort Erie should use (and I'm being reasonable and conservative): WPS 16.5%, DD EX 20.5% (just like Woodbine), Triactors, supers, pick 4's 24-25% tops. And it wouldn't hurt to drop the Pick 3 to around 16%. This bet generally doesn't attract large pools at Fort Erie anyway, and at this rate, it will attract many players from across Canada and the USA to play it, and once someone handicaps a Pick 3, making picks leads to the temptation to bet win or other exotics. Oh, and start the Pick 3 in the first race, not the second. I can see Woodbine throwing a hissy fit if the Pick 3's takeout was lowered to 16% though, but this isn't about Woodbine, it is about saving Fort Erie.

Lowering the takeout will attract price sensitive players from other jurisdictions, and will only increase Fort Erie's bottom line, as the bulk of their money comes from off track wagers where profits aren't related to takeout but only volume.

On track though, could be temporarily affected, however, studies and empirical evidence has shown that by lowering takeout, horseplayers last longer, and eventually will churn back the extra money won. The more they go home with, the more likely they are to return quicker, and the more likely they are to become regulars. This does not happen overnight, but it is something almost every track in North America has refused to experiment with. In today's environment it is a must, especially for a track like Fort Erie which is hanging on by a nose hair. It is the best way by far to create future regulars.

In Fort Erie's case, you can't continue to have a track takeout of 26.2% on doubles and exactors, and actually publicly state you are trying to improve the bottom line.


2. Introduce the Fort Erie Five, a jackpot bet that is identical to the Beulah Fortune Pick 6. The takeout rate isn't that important, so 25% would be OK. It has to be a $1 minimum in order to attract US bettors, who can't bet fractional amounts from US tracks or ADWs on Canadian tracks. Give out 50% of the new money (after takeout) bet each day to those who have the most winners in the Pick 5, and have the other 50% go towards a jackpot that is only won if a lone winning ticket picks all five winners.

This may only build up significantly once a year, but as it does, handle will go through the roof for the days leading up to the jackpot being hit.

Most importantly is when this pool gets up over $100,000, it will start attracting lottery and slots players to make their way to the racetrack and hang out on the horsey smelling side of the grandstand for at least a little while.

If Fort Erie wants to get aggressive, they can seed it or guarantee a $5,000 payoff, which probably will wind up costing them next to nothing if anything.


3. Re-introduce the Breakfast Club. I used to really enjoy it when I was a kid spending my summer holidays at the Fort. Canadian bacon on a bun for a buck, while watching horses workout in the morning. It might mean Daryl Wells Jr. having to wake up early on a Sunday morning, but sacrifices need to be made.

Eddie Lynn told me that they stopped it, because they were attracting too many "mooches" looking for a cheap breakfast. Again, times have changed, and the main purpose of this would be to try to entice some of the slot players to come out for some fresh air, and they might find a jockey or trainer being interviewed to be somewhat educational and maybe even fascinating.

Luring them out with a free quick pick on today's Pick 4 or a voucher to buy an early daily double might work wonders.

Again, tracks make more from gamblers who bet on the horses over slots dollar for dollar.


4. Change post time on Sundays to 12:15 or 12:30. Sunday handles suck. Fort Erie should compete for the first dollars bet across North America on that day. It might get more people handicapping Fort Erie. Starting at 1:45 or even 1:00 puts them in competition with too many A tracks, and Woodbine too. Plus if Fort Erie does the Breakfast Club at 9-10PM, it makes it easier for the slot player to use their double voucher. Never race more than 8 races on a Sunday. Run extra races on Monday or Tuesday always.


5. Pay more purse money the larger the field size. Field size is one of the biggest handle drivers there is. Fort Erie averaged 8.24 horses per race last year, which ranks them 33 out of 69 tracks.
In order to maximize field size and handle, I strongly believe that 6 horse fields for the same class should not run for the same purse that a 12 horse field runs for.
Horsemen won't like this idea, because their ideal field size is 1, but since we are talking about keeping their plant open, they might bend.

Fort Erie has a budget to give out around $100,000, which gives them an average purse of around $12,000. Obviously, $4,000 claimer should run for lower than $14,000 claimers, but it is also key to remember that it costs exactly the same to train a 4 claimer as it does an allowance horse. So lets look at the average race for Fort Erie, a $7500 claimer for non winners of 3. The average purse for that race should be $12,000. However, in order to reward races that have higher non coupled entrants, it would pay to change the minimum purse to $9,000 for this race if it attracts only 6 or less starters. For each additional starter, $1,000 should be added to the purse. This means an 8 horse race will run for an $11,000 purse, and a 12 horse race, for example, will run for a $15,000 purse.

If this does in fact lead to bigger fields, handle will rise causing purses to start to rise, and the base can be increased, as a win win situation is created.


6. Forget the idea that quality horses will come to Fort Erie, or are even needed to be attracted. First off, when you have just $12,000 a race to hand out, you can't reasonably believe quality will show up. Secondly, historically, small field races that give out bigger purses at Fort Erie produce very low handle.

There is really no reason to have allowance or even maiden allowance races at Fort Erie. If a horse is perceived to be worth more than $16,000, let the local connections of that horse prove it at Woodbine, and hopefully they can enhance their year with the bigger purses Woodbine has to offer, and conversely, why entice a superior Woodbine horse to come to Fort Erie to steal purse money in a short field of horses next to nobody bets? Fort Erie is a niche track, that is now getting extra government benefits. It should do everything it can to give purse money out to local horsemen whenever possible, plus betting comes from bigger fields not horses running for higher tags or no tag at all (the exception being, obviously, The Prince of Wales).

6a). I'm not sure if they are doing this or not, but when putting a race card together, the Racing Secretary should give preference to field size over purse size, with the only exception being Stake Races. Also, carryovers should be treated equally with races in the book. If they have attracted a bigger field than the race in the book, it gets preference.


7. The second biggest asset Fort Erie has right now, outside of the existing horseplayer, is the existing horseman. Keeping owners and trainers in the game is critical. Most owners don't expect to win, but the closer they come to winning, the more likely they are to stick around, and maybe even increase their stable. The small owner is likely to bring in partners, and they in turn, bring family members to watch their horses and hopefully get their picture taken in the winner's circle. This can create more potential horseplayers over time.

It is key not to keep the minimum purses for cheap claimers to be as high as possible, even if it is at the sacrifice of limiting the higher end races in purse money. Most tracks get this already, and Fort Erie has been improving in this area.


8. Write Canadian bred or Ontario bred claiming races. Again, it is important these races fill for the sake of handle, so this needs to be implemented on a trial basis. These races can boost participation from a few sources. Many Fort Erie horsemen have locally bred horses who are forced to compete with US breds. This is generally a disadvantage. By having Ontario bred claiming races, it entices local horsemen to buy them. It will also draw some Woodbine horses who could be running at Fort Erie at bargain (for local Fort Erie horsemen) prices, which could eventually increase the horse population at Fort Erie as these horse change hands.

It also gets the interest of more breeders from across Ontario to watch races at Fort Erie, where the horse they bred has a better chance to win. Breeders have families and friends, and they might bet a few bucks on the race as well.


9. Call every local business in the Great Niagara region and Buffalo and offer a $12 all you can eat buffet for groups of 6 or more. I don't know if they do this, but it should be done.


10. Outsource the food stands in the main grandstand to affordable fast food places that Fort Erie is lacking, like a KFC, Arby's, Swiss Chalet/Harveys, and/or Burger King. Put a Swiss Chalet, and my wife might even make a few bets. Worse case scenario is that people come for pick up only....at least they realize what the inside of a track looks like, and may gamble in the future.

The parking lot is huge. A Ponderosa like steak house would go over nicely there.


11. I can't mention number 11 on this blog, as it will enrage Woodbine, and I know quite a few Woodbine execs read my blog. But it is huge. It actually should be number 2 on this list.


12. Interview the trainer of one of the favorites right after the post parade for the live crowd and possibly the simulcast crowd. Maybe interview the winning jockey and/or trainer after the race. Pre race interviews though, are better to generate wagers.


13. Elissa Blowe has enough experience when it comes to noticing if a horse is either acting up, sweaty, or looking great in the post parade. It might be a good idea to have her Tweet an observation or two each race to the at home bettor. Follow Fort Erie on Twitter here.


14. Hire me as a consultant. I don't care about the money that much, though a little compensation would be expected. I would love to be part of this turnaround. I can only give Fort Erie around 20 hours a week of live time anyway. But it would benefit Fort Erie tremendously as I would come in handy in supervising and implementing my suggestions, and more importantly refining them if needed, and coming up with more as time goes on.

I have a few other suggestions but they are minor right now.